Irwin Industrial Tool v. Pifer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Christine Pifer, et al., No. 49, September Term, 2021 AUTHENTICATION THROUGH CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UNDER MARYLAND RULE 5-901(b)(4) – “REASONABLE JUROR” TEST – ALTERNATIVE GROUNDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT – Court of Appeals held that items purchased on eBay that purportedly contained defendant’s product contaminated with asbestos were authenticated as exemplars of product, as there was sufficient circumstantial evidence for reasonable juror to find by preponderance of evidence that substance within containers was defendant’s product. Court of Appeals concluded…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. BalbosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Piscatelli v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Dehn v. EdgecombeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- United States v. VaynerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mooney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Williams v. PNC Bank, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Moore v. CVS PharmacyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Oxley v. Frederick Mem. HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Selective Way Ins. v. Fireman's Fund Ins.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023