Mooney v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Christopher Mooney v. State of Maryland, No. 32, September Term, 2023 “REASONABLE JUROR” TEST – AUTHENTICATION THROUGH TESTIMONY OF WITNESS WITH KNOWLEDGE UNDER MARYLAND RULE 5-901(b)(1) – AUTHENTICATION THROUGH CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UNDER MARYLAND RULE 5-901(b)(4) – Supreme Court of Maryland held that “reasonable juror” test applies to authentication of videos—i.e., for trial court to admit video, there must be sufficient evidence for reasonable juror to find by preponderance of evidence that video is what it is claimed to be. Supreme Court concluded that video can be authenticated through…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- United States v. VaynerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Sublet, Harris & Monge-Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- In Re MorrellVermont Superior Court · 2026
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- State of Iowa v. Max AmydaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2026