In Re MARY E GRIFFIN REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, P.J.
This case involves the enforceability of the in terrorem (no-contest) clause in the Mary E. Griffin Revocable Grantor Trust agreement. Respondent appeals as of right the probate court’s order declaring the clause unenforceable and denying her motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(9) and (10). Although MCL 700.2518 does not apply to trusts, we conclude that it reflects this state’s public policy that a no-contest clause in a trust agreement is unenforceable if there is probable cause for *534challenging the trust. We further conclude that petitioner, Otto Nacovsky, had probable cause…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Gleason v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re REISMAN ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Schiffer v. BrentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Estate of StanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re MARY E GRIFFIN REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUSTMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Martin L. Smith v. John Norman, Successor Trustee of the Martin L. Smith Revocable Trust AgreementCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
- Nacovsky v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 2009