Legal Opinion
In Re REISMAN ESTATE
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 3, 2005No. Docket 252172PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmolenski, J.
Respondent Jack Kaufman, the personal representative of Samuel Reisman’s estate, appeals as of right from an opinion and order holding that Samuel Reisman’s exercise of a limited power of ap pointment granted to him in a marital trust was invalid. We reverse and remand. This case is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
I. BASIC PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Geraldine G. Reisman established a revocable living trust, which in part created a marital trust for the benefit of her husband, Samuel Reisman. In the marital trust, Geraldine provided:
Upon the death of [Samuel],...…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Jewett v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Kremlick EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Detroit Bank & Trust Co. v. GroutMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re Stillwell TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Bill & Dena Brown Trust v. GarciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re Estate of StanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Miller Osborne Perry TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.