Legal Opinion

Lewis v. LeGrow

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 2003No. Docket 234723, 234726, 234727PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, P.J.

This case involves the surreptitious, nonconsensual videotaping of intimate acts of sexual relations in defendant James F. LeGrow’s bedroom. After a joint trial, a jury found that defendant violated MCL 750.539d, invaded plaintiffs Jessica Lewis, Bethany L. Dennis, and Amy Shemanski’s common-law right to privacy, and intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress. Defendant argues on appeal that because plaintiffs willingly exposed them*179selves while having sex with him, his bedroom was not a “private place” under § 539d, nor could he intrude on their privacy. Further, defendant…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Garretson v. City of Madison HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. In re VanDalenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Dalley v. Dykema Gossett PLLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API