Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. Hahn

This case calls on us to decide whether an accord and satisfaction existed between the parties. The Court of Appeals found that it did not. We disagree and rule that the parties reached an accord and satisfaction. Therefore, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to the trial court for entry of judgment in favor of defendants.

SUBSTANTIVE FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case centers on a contract to remodel and reconstruct a lakeside residence in Edwardsburg, Michigan, 1 made between plaintiff, Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc., and defendants Juanita and Ronald…