Legal Opinion

Schiffer v. Brenton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1929No. Docket No. 121, Calendar No. 34,447PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff is the daughter of Samuel Brenton, deceased, and is the executrix of and beneficiary under his will. There has been no distribution of the estate, and the construction and validity of two clauses of the will were involved in this case. One was of minor importance, and the decree as to it is acquiesced in by all parties. The other question is of importance, both in amount involved and in principle, and has not been passed upon by this court. This question arises under these circumstances. Arthur and Willis, sons of deceased, were each given $10,000 by the will. They contested the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. South Norwalk Trust Co. v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  5. Friend's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Rossi v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Womble v. GunterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  4. In re Estate of StanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Saier v. SaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API