Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Department of Transportation

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2003No. Docket 235026PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted the trial court’s grant of defendant’s summary-disposition motion under MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (C)(8). We affirm.

Plaintiffs contend that their right to equal protection was violated when the trial court applied a three-year period of limitation to their inverse-condemnation claim against defendant, when inverse-condemnation actions against entities other than the state are subject to at least a six-year limitation period. We disagree. This Court reviews de novo a trial court’s ruling on a party’s motion for summary disposition. Spiek v Dep’t of Transportation,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Forest v. ParmaleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lim v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Rental Properties Owners Ass'n v. Kent County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Hess v. Cannon TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Willett v. Waterford Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Southfield Educ. Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Southfield Pub. Sch.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API