Gleason v. Department of Transportation
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted the trial court’s grant of defendant’s summary-disposition motion under MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (C)(8). We affirm.
Plaintiffs contend that their right to equal protection was violated when the trial court applied a three-year period of limitation to their inverse-condemnation claim against defendant, when inverse-condemnation actions against entities other than the state are subject to at least a six-year limitation period. We disagree. This Court reviews de novo a trial court’s ruling on a party’s motion for summary disposition. Spiek v Dep’t of Transportation,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Forest v. ParmaleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Lim v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by90 opinions
- Rental Properties Owners Ass'n v. Kent County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hess v. Cannon TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Willett v. Waterford Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Southfield Educ. Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Southfield Pub. Sch.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.