Legal Opinion

Fujise v. Los Angeles Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1909No. Civ. No. 730PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. "Walter Bordwell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Action brought by heirs of a deceased person to recover damages for her death alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant’s employees in operating one of its street-cars. Judgment was for plaintiffs for $2,000, and defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Plaintiffs are the husband and children, respectively, of Hideno Fujise, who, while riding in an express wagon on Central avenue in the city of Los Angeles, was thrown from the wagon by a collision between it and one of the defendant’s street-cars, which was operated upon a track…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Galveston City Railroad v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. BowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Needham v. San Francisco & San José R.R.California Supreme Court · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Parmenter v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Tousley v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API