Legal Opinion
Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 15, 1926No. Docket No. 5458PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
An action by Edna A. Curran, the surviving wife of Daniel M. Curran, to recover damages for the death of the latter, alleged to have resulted from the negligence of appellant, Earle C. Anthony, Inc., a corporation, and Almond Houston, codefendants in the action. A verdict was returned by a jury, on which judgment was entered against both defendants and from which the corporation has appealed.
Appellant was on July 22, 1922, a dealer in new and used automobiles with its place of business in San Francisco, defendant Houston being in its employ. Among the duties of the latter was that of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Russell v. BayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Brown v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.