Parmenter v. McDougall
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Benjamin E. Page, Arthur C. Hurt, Arthur P. Coe, and Lyle Pendergast, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff, while riding on a motorcycle, in company with his brother, Benjamin Parmenter, was struck by an electric automobile owned and driven by the defendant. The accident occurred at the intersection of Fremont Avenue and Columbia Street in the city of South Pasadena. Fremont Street runs in a northerly and southerly direction. At its northerly end it connects with Columbia Street, which runs easterly and westerly. The defendant was driving her car northerly along Fremont Avenue, intending to turn to the left and go…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Brickell v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Campagna v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Pope v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Eramdjian v. Interstate Bakery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.