State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga County Court
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
For the following reasons, the court of appeals properly granted the common pleas court’s motion and dismissed the case.
Initially, as the court of appeals held, a writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 405, 406, 696 N.E.2d 581, 582; State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 279, 658 N.E.2d 723, 724. Therefore, Sharif was not entitled to a -writ of mandamus to compel the common pleas court to rule on his two motions because the common pleas court had already…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Papp v. JamesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Boieru v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ogle v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State ex rel. Eads v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Hunter v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Hunter v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3 v. Dunlap, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Ross County2018
- State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Taylor v. LefflerOhio Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.