Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Papp v. James

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1994No. 93-1626PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents six issues for our review. First, should either party’s evidence be stricken? Second, is there a clear legal duty to appoint a guardian ad litem upon a parent’s motion before interviewing a child in a custody dispute? Third, is there a clear legal duty in this case to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law upon timely motion? Fourth, does Elizabeth have an adequate remedy at law? Fifth, should a writ of mandamus issue either to vacate the custody decree and to compel appointment of a guardian ad litem and a new hearing, or to order the filing of findings of fact and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In re Adoption of GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re A.G.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Grove v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wilhelm-Kissinger v. KissingerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Jackson v. Herron, Unpublished Decision (8-5-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API