Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1998No. 98-227PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 279, 658 N.E.2d 723, 724.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Forsyth v. BrignerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API