Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2000No. 99-1733PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 375, 376, 708 N.E.2d 718, 719. And appellees had no duty to create documents to meet Taylor’s requests. State ex rel. Warren v. Warner (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 432, 433, 704 N.E.2d 1228, 1229.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Warren v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Swingle v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Swingle v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Taylor v. LefflerOhio Supreme Court · 2000