Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1996No. 95-1769PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 6 OBR 4, 450 N.E.2d 1163.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Gantt v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Kirk v. BurchamOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Roberts v. Hatheway (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Evans v. Mohr (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Cox v. Youngstown Civ. Serv. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API