Legal Opinion

Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. Hobbs

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1896No. 17,649PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellee, as administrator of the estate of James F. Hobbs, deceased, sued the appel*147lant in the circuit court, in a complaint of but one paragraph, for negligence in causing the death of said decedent.

A trial of the issues joined resulted in a verdict and judgment against appellant for $1,750, which judgment upon appeal to the AppellateCourtwas reversed because the evidence did not support the verdict, that court holding that the evidence showed that thé danger from which the decedent’s injury resulted was one which was incident to the service in which he was engaged and the risk of which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CorpsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Peerless Stone Co. v. WrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KemperIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Miller v. BurksIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kelso v. KelsoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Stuart v. New Albany Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. MessickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API