Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Dunn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1895No. 17,012PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Prom the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellees, as separate judgment creditors of several of the appellants, sued them to set aside several conveyances of real estate situate in Lawrence county, made by some of the appellants to others of said appellants, as fraudulent against the creditors of the grantors. The circuit court overruled separate demurrers to each of the three paragraphs of the complaint.

A trial of the issues formed upon the complaint resulted in a special finding of the facts by the court, on which it stated conclusions of law in favor of the appellees, on which they had judgment over appellants’ exceptions to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Brumfield v. DrookIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Orton v. TillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Berkshire v. ShultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rochester Bridge Co. v. McNeillIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Coddington v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. McFarland v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API