Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Corps

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1890No. 14,457PublishedCited by 48 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

It has been often ruled by this court that an attack upon one of several paragraphs of a complaint made for the first time in the assignment of errors will be unavailing, even though the paragraph assailed may be radically defective. This settled doctrine renders it unnecessary for us to consider the objection urged against the first paragraph of the appellee’s complaint.

The second paragraph of the complaint was assailed by demurrer in the court below, and we are required to give judgment upon it. The paragraph named alleges that the plaintiff was in the service of the defendant as a laborer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Taylor v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ames v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1893

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API