Stuart v. New Albany Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.
The only question we are required to determine in this case is, whether the court committed any error in sustaining the appellee’s demurrer to the appellant’s amended complaint.
It is averred that the appellee was an Indiana corporation engaged in the business of erecting stone sawmills with the wooden framework thereto, and that on the 10th day of April, 1895, it was erecting in the city of Bloomington, Indiana, a certain building and frame sawmill; that one Martin Craft was then in appellee’s employment for the purpose of managing the erection and construction of said building; that, in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dill v. MarmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Wortman v. MinichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. ShalstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Peirce v. OliverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Standard Steel Car Co. v. MartineczIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.