Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. Messick
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Daviess Circuit Court; II. Q. Houghton, .Judge. Action by George W. Messick against, the Southern Indiana- Railway Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.
The second paragraph of complaint on which the cause was, tided is substantially as follows (omitting formal parts) : That on September 1, 1902, *678plaintiff was employed by the defendant to work as a common laborer and section band on a certain section of defendant’s railroad (describing the terminal of the section) ; that on September 25, 1902, the plaintiff was again employed by the defendant in the same capacity, and continued this work for two days, September 25 and 26, 1902; that the plaintiff resided at the town of Odon, .in Daviess county, during the whole time he was in the. employ of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. SheeksIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. R. v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Haney v. MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- McConnell v. Porter Memorial HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Union Traction Co. v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Krohn v. Shidler, Admnx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.