Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1958No. Appeal, No. 79PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

The City of Pittsburgh (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) has taken this appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”) dated January 7, *4621957 prescribing changes in the contractual formula rate for City customers served by South Pittsburgh Water Company (hereinafter referred to as “Company.”)

The Company supplies water in the suburban Pittsburgh area of Allegheny County lying south of the Monongahela River in twenty-two boroughs and eight townships in addition to nine wards of the City which have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Brown v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Harrisburg Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Bologna v. Harmar Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1962
  4. City of Pgh. v. Pa. PucCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Testa v. R. & J. Tanning Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API