Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Testa v. R. & J. Tanning Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1968No. Appeal, No. 33Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

This appeal presents a difficult question, namely, did claimant’s second accident cause a recurrence of the disability which arose from the injuries he sustained in his first accident, or is Ms claim for a new injury caused by Ms second accident? The Board found as a fact that there was a recurrence of the first injury, and the lower court affirmed the finding. That such question is one of fact finds support in Curcio v. Bendik, 109 Pa. Superior Ct. 241, 167 A. 626 (1933).

Appellant, the employer’s carrier at the time of the first accident, argues that there…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hornetz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Gallagher v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Gammaitoni v. Gasparini Excavating Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Carey v. Frederick Wiedlandt & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Gasparovich v. Federal Reserve BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API