Legal Opinion
Call v. Linn
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1924PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
Assignments of error numbered 1 to 5 are not well taken. The questions objected to were propounded to witnesses who had dealings with the defendant on or about the time of the transaction between them and the plaintiff. The evidence was adduced for the purpose of establishing a partnership.
“Our law has always treated the partnership relation as founded in voluntary contract. It does not surprise parties into a partnership against their will, although it does not require an express agreement between them, nor is it bound by their statements of intention in associating themselves together for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Post v. KimberlyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812
- Mendel v. Miller & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joseph v. Donover Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Burnett v. Lemon Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- First National Bank of Eugene v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- C. A. Babcock Co. v. KatzOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Joseph v. Donover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.