Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Hoffman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 13, 1963No. Civ. 20836PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
This is an appeal by Rose Hoffman, hereinafter referred to as appellant, from a summary judgment in favor of Jennie Goldstein and Gussie Zeman, hereinafter referred to as the respondents. Samuel Zeman, the executor of the last will and testament of Samuel Hoffman, hereinafter referred to as the executor, has been designated as a respondent on this appeal and has filed a brief herein as such.
Question Presented
Was the trial court justified in granting the motion of the respondents for a summary judgment?
The Record
The action herein was filed by the respondents against the executor, the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Loma Portal Civic Club v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Saporta v. BarbagelataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.