Legal Opinion
Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank
California Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 8916PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, J., pro tem.
Suit to impress a trust upon personal property consisting of shares of stock in various companies, distributed to respondents in an estate. Certain phases of this matter have been before this court on former appeals. (Estate of Simonton, 183 Cal. 53 [190 Pac. 442 ] Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank, 192 Cal. 658 [221 Pac. 368].)
The essential facts are not in dispute and are as follows: George W. Simonton and Jane Simonton were husband and wife. The husband died testate in Los Angeles in the year 1904. He had been previously married .and left children by such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Myrtle Fountain v. MaximCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Kaneko v. OkudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Minnich v. MinnichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.