Legal Opinion

Furman v. Craine

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1912No. Civ. No. 1048PublishedCited by 30 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. M. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

It appears from the findings that on June 2, 1884, when plaintiff was four years of age, Margaret E. Synnot, who at the time of her death was known as Margaret E. Cleaveland, a childless, widowed sister of defendant James 0. Craine, made an agreement in writing with the latter and his then wife, Emma Craine, who were the father and mother of plaintiff, whereby they forever surrendered! to Synnot the control, custody and society of plaintiff, and relinquished to her all claims and rights which they had to and over plaintiff by reason of being her parents, in consideration of which Synnot…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Sharkey v. McDermottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Sutton v. HaydenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API