Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Manno
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 6, 2003, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant, a postal employee, was discharged from his employment due to disqualifying misconduct. It is well settled that violating a known policy of an employer can constitute disqualifying misconduct (see…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of BarceneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of FerroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of KempAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ScacciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Sarson (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Claim of RoundtreeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.