Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Barcene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 11, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

It is well settled that a knowing violation of an employer’s established policies can constitute disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Graham [Commissioner of Labor], 305 AD2d 922 [2003]). In the instant matter, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant accessed nonwork-related Web sites, including…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of BachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MannoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of KempAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of PesantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. In re the Claim of RoundtreeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. In re the Claim of RoundtreeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API