Jarvis v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for an alleged breach of contract to pay a reward to a tax informant. Pending are defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and plaintiffs motion for leave to file a cross-motion for summary judgment. Oral argument was held on March 26, 1999. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motions for leave to amend and cross-move for summary judgment are denied, and defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted.
BACKGROUND1
On November 9, 1993, plaintiff entered into a written…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Terteling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Albermarle Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- D Subligraphics, S.A. v. Coates Brothers, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Goolsby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- bell/heery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Schweiger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Whistleblower 14106-10W v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.