Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 19, 1999No. 97-806TPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action for an alleged breach of contract to pay a reward to a tax informant. Pending are defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and plaintiffs motion for leave to file a cross-motion for summary judgment. Oral argument was held on March 26, 1999. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motions for leave to amend and cross-move for summary judgment are denied, and defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted.

BACKGROUND1

On November 9, 1993, plaintiff entered into a written…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Terteling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Albermarle Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. D Subligraphics, S.A. v. Coates Brothers, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Goolsby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. bell/heery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Centex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Schweiger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Whistleblower 14106-10W v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API