Legal Opinion

Goolsby v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 27, 1990No. 90-118CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(4) for failure to state a claim for relief. To be decided is the issue *89whether damages sought by plaintiff for loss of reputation for credit and lost profits and attorneys’ fees and costs expended in another lawsuit constitute non-recoverable damages. After defendant moved, plaintiff sought to amend her complaint over defendant’s opposition. Plaintiff’s motion was granted. Since defendant addressed the new complaint in its reply brief, the court treated defendant’s motion as directed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Louise J. Hamlet v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Richard L. Thoen v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Goolsby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. Gates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API