Legal Opinion
bell/heery v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 7, 2014No. 2013-5002PublishedCited by 159 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Bell/Heery, a Joint Venture (“BH”), appeals from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing its complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). See Bell/Heery v. United States, 106 Fed. Cl. 300 (2012) (“CFC Decision”). Because BH has failed to set forth facts sufficient to state a viable claim for the requested relief under the theories…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Metcalf Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Hopi Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Call Henry, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.