Albermarle Bank & Trust Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. This order elaborates upon an oral ruling given by the Court at the close of argument on the motion. That ruling was based upon consideration of the parties’ submissions and oral argument.
Facts
In February of 1978, Milodon Engineering Inc. (Milodon), a California Corporation, requested plaintiff Ablemarle Bank and Trust Company (Albemarle) to serve as a lender for a Farmer’s Home Administration (FmHA) 90 per centum guaranteed loan. The loan was for a total of $600,000 to be made in three phases, a working…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Terteling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Jerry Dwayne Baxter v. Graham W. Claytor, Jr., Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cummings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Pratt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- San Juan City College v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Jarvis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.