Legal Opinion

In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 2001No. C4-00-2239PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge

In this surcharge action, appellant professional trustee challenges the district court’s conclusion that, during the 1990-94 accounting period, trustees had a duty under Minn.Stat. § 501B.10 (1994) to diversify the assets of a trust. Appellant also contends that the district court abused its discretion by (1) calculating the surcharge from the beginning of the accounting period, (2) requiring appellant to reimburse to the trust all of its trustee fees for the accounting period, and (3) granting an award of attorney fees against appellant. Because the district court did not…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Finn v. Alliance BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Derosier v. Utility Systems of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API