Legal Opinion

Finn v. Alliance Bank

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 3, 2013No. Nos. A12-1930, A12-2092PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.*

These consolidated appeals arise out of a clawback action brought under the MUFTA by appellant-receiver. In one appeal (A12-2092), the receiver challenges the district court’s dismissal, on statute-of-limitations grounds, of its claims brought under the MUFTA against defendant-respondents Home Federal Bank, Klein-Bank, Merchants Bank, and M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (respondent banks). In the other appeal (A12-1930), appellant Alliance Bank challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the receiver on its MUFTA claims against Alliance. We affirm the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
  4. Donell v. KowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus BoosalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. George Reilly, as trustee of the Nathan L. Bentson 1993 Irrevocable Trust v. Michael J. AntonelloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Kelley v. Opportunity Finance, LLC (In re Petters Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
  5. Stoebner v. Opportunity Finance, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API