Legal Opinion
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 8, 1996No. C9-94-1335PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
This appeal arises out of a claim by respondent ServiceMaster of St. Cloud, Inc. (ServiceMaster) that appellant Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company (Sentry) should have paid for repair work that ServiceMaster completed in 1990 and 1991 on the fire damaged home of Sentry’s insured, Nancy Molli-nedo. The court of appeals affirmed both the Stearns County trial court’s award of damages to ServiceMaster based on equitable claims of unjust enrichment and estoppel and the jury verdict in favor of ServiceMas-ter on its negligence claim. Because we conclude that ServiceMaster…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Gabrielson v. WarnemundeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Drobnak v. Andersen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Edward A. Chambers, Jr. v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.