Legal Opinion

Caulfield v. C. W. Jewett Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1931No. 28,451PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In September, 1924, respondent was retained under a written •contract as plaintiff’s attorney to enforce a claim against O. W. Jewett or C. W. Jewett Company, Inc. a corporation. Her fee was to be one-third of the amount obtained through settlement or litigation. An action was brought in behalf of plaintiff against de fendant for $22,000 due for salary. While the suit was .pending plaintiff discharged respondent and employed other attorneys, who moved to amend the complaint in the action brought by respondent. Thereupon respondent intervened to claim an attorney’s lien. When the motion to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Kubu v. KabesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Northrup v. HaywardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. First National Bank v. TowleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Palmer v. First Minneapolis Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Streissguth v. Chase Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Fredsall v. Minnesota State Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Northern National Bank v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API