Legal Opinion

Fredsall v. Minnesota State Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1940No. 32,251PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Semon Fredsall and wife, Ida E. (hereafter referred to as plaintiffs) appeal from an order denying each of their blended motions: (1) To adopt their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law; or (2) if that be denied, for such findings and conclusions as the court might deem appropriate in its view of the evidence and applicable law; (3) striking from an order theretofore made that part thereof disallowing their claim against defendant; and (4) for a new trial on the ground that allowance of their claim is the only permissible result upon the evidence adduced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Swick v. SheridanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Young v. HolgateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Mienes v. Lucker Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Caulfield v. C. W. Jewett Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. In Re American Finnish Workers SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Czanstkowski v. MatterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Makoff v. MakoffUtah Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API