Legal Opinion
Streissguth v. Chase Securities Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 1936No. 30,928PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
The appeal is from an order refusing to set aside the service of summons herein. The facts are, in substance, as follows: The service was made upon S. Paul Skahen, commissioner of securities of this state. The action is to recover $1,360 paid for five shares of defendant’s stock and for five shares of the stock of Chase National Bank of New York City, the two stocks being inseparable, in one certificate, neither being capable of transfer without the other. On September 19, 1929, plaintiff was solicited to' buy these shares of stock at his home in New Ulm, this state, by an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bauer v. Bond & Goodwin Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Rhines v. Skinner Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Love v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Stern v. National City Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
- Zochrison v. Redemption Gold Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Vogel v. Chase Securities Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.