Northrup v. Hayward
Supreme Court of Minnesota
In an action brought in the district court for Hennepin county, plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed to this court from an order denying a new trial. The cause having been remanded, judgment was entered for $2,151. A settlement of the case was made between plaintiff and defendant without the knowledge of his attorney, Frank D. Tar rabee, to whom plaintiff had agreed to pay one third of the. amount of the verdict.
Read the full summary
In an action brought in the district court for Hennepin county, plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed to this court from an order denying a new trial. The cause having been remanded, judgment was entered for $2,151. A settlement of the case was made between plaintiff and defendant without the knowledge of his attorney, Frank D. Tar rabee, to whom plaintiff had agreed to pay one third of the. amount of the verdict. The attorney then applied to the court for an execution to the amount due him for services. The application was heard before Holt, J., who ordered judgment in favor of the…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Plaintiff in this action was injured while in the employ, and by reason of the alleged negligence, of defendant, and brought this action to recover damages therefor. He had a verdict in the .court below, and defendant appealed to this court, from an order denying a new trial, where it was affirmed. 99 Minn. 299, 109 N. W. 241. After . the cause was remanded, judgment was entered for the amount of the verdict, less a reduction of $500 ordered by the trial court, with interest and costs, amounting in all to $2,151. An execution was issued and delivered to the sheriff for collection, who by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cones v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Porter, Taylor & Co. v. HansonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Boogren v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Johnson v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Northrup v. HaywardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Skelly v. RichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Akers v. AkersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Kubu v. KabesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.