Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1984No. 83-671PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

When the factual findings of the Industrial Commission are supported by some evidence in the record, this court will not disturb those findings. State, ex rel. Rossetti, v. Indus. Comm. (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 230, 232; State, ex rel. Allerton, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 396, 397 [23 O.O.3d 358]; State, ex rel. G. F. Business Equip., Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 446, 447 [20 O.O.3d 379].

Relator-appellant asserts that there was no evidence before the commission upon which it could have based its determination that he had a fifteen percent permanent partial disability.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Rossetti v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API