Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Combs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1992No. 90-566PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

For the reasons that follow, the decision of the court of appeals is reversed.

Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-16 provides:

“(A) Form C-86 shall be used to present motions to the Bureau, Board or Commission.
“(C) A motion shall fully set forth the question presented together with a succinct statement of the action or relief sought.
*380“(D) Motions shall be accompanied by substantial competent proof conforming to the standards established in Rule 4121-3-09(B).”

Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-09(B)(2) provides:

“Proof may be presented by affidavit, deposition, oral testimony, written statement, document, or other forms.”

No…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Simpson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Bouchonville v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Fellers v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Long v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. McEndree v. Consolidation Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Mathess v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Coulter v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Hawkins v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API