Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Latino v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1968No. 40982PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrowN, J.

It seems clear that an appeal from the determination of the Industrial Commission in this case was available under Section 4123.519, Revised Code, and that under such circumstances mandamus does not lie. The existence and adequacy of this remedy at law was not raised in the Court of Appeals, so in the interest of judicial economy we have chosen to decide the appeal on its merits.

The only question in this cause is whether an injured workman who is receving compensation for permanent and total disability at the maximum statutory rate on an ©e-*105cupational disease claim may, at the same time,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State, Ex Rel. Frank v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Benton v. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State ex rel. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Mansour v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API