Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fort

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1933No. 3995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Appellee agreed in writing with appellant to sell and convey to him a section of land -in. *1081New Mexico and to deliver state leases on another section. The only part of the consideration for same which is material here is as follows: The assumption of the payment of $1,920 owing on the land to he conveyed, in three equal payments due in 1933, 1934, and 1935. The written contract further provided:

“First party is to furnish abstract showing •a good and merchantable title subject to the indebtedness above mentioned, together with a good and sufficient deed of conveyance to above…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crescent Ins. v. CampTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Putnam Supply Co. v. ChapinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Atlas Metal Works v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Shuttuck v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Middleton v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  2. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hampton v. MintonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Acme Pest Control Co. v. YoungmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Brent v. CorbinMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API