Legal Opinion
Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Nearen
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1940No. 7375PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SLATTON, Commissioner.
Defendants in error executed a division order to the Gulf Pipe Line Company containing the following provisions:
“First — The oil run in pursuance of this division order shall become the property of the Gulf Pipe Line Company as soon as the same is received into its pipe lines.
“Second — The oil received in pursuance of this division order shall be paid for to the party or parties entitled thereto, according to the division of interest shown above, at the- price for each day’s receipts posted on -that day by the Gulf Pipe Line Company, for the same kind and quality of oil…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. HebertTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Grayce Oil Co. v. PetersonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Ferguson v. MansfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Kishi v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
- Reagan v. BruffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. AielloTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Dobbins v. ReddenTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Perrotta v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- Trevino v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. (In re Trevino)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.