Legal Opinion

Brent v. Corbin

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1965No. 43481PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

This is a suit by vendors of real property, Gordon R. Brent and Allen C. Thompson, Jr., against the vendee, Bill R. Corbin, for the recovery of earnest money under a contract of sale. The contract provided for a warranty deed with a merchantable title. The vendee stopped payment on the earnest money check because vendors did not own the minerals. The Chancery Court of Yazoo County agreed with that position, held vendors were unable to comply with the contract of sale, and dismissed their bill of complaint. We affirm that decree.

In 1962 Brent and Thompson were engaged in buying and selling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newberry v. FrenchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Smith v. FortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Vanlandingham v. JenkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. CorleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fleming v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snow Lake Shores Property Owners Corp. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hamilton v. BradfordDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1980
  3. Haden v. Krupp Asset Management Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
  4. Hill v. BridgersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Kanza Construction, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern Railways CompanyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API