Legal Opinion

Putnam Supply Co. v. Chapin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1931No. 900PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

This is the second appeal of this case. Our opinion on the former appeal is reported in 26 S.W.(2d) 426. After the cause was remanded by this court for retrial, the pleadings were amended. As the case comes to us this time, it originated as a suit by appellee, Chapin, against appellants Putnam Supply Company and P. L. Burks jointly for actual damages in the sum of $1,731.05, and exemplary damages in the sum of $2,000 for the alleged conversion of certain oil well casing. The Putnam Supply Company’s answer, in addition to defensive matters, contained allegations to the effect that both Burks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bryan v. SundbergTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  4. State of Texas v. Travis CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Tunstall v. WormleyTexas Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gateley v. HumphreyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Chapin v. Putnam Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Triangle Cab Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Smith v. FortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API