Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1927No. 2916. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, O. T.

This suit was filed originally by the appellee, Moore, to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale of certain lands, and, in the alternative, to recover $500 forfeit money deposited in the First National Bank, said bank being made a party.

Upon the first trial, the district court decreed specific performance of the contract. This judgment was reversed by this court, and the cause was remanded for trial upon the rights of the parties to the $500 in the bank. See 289 S. W. 1045.

After reversal, Moore amended his petition, eliminating his action for specific performance,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Fowler v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Brownwood v. Texas Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Lessenich v. SellersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. FortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Moore v. MiddletonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Rabinowitz v. DarnallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Morley v. GiesekerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API