Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Minton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1990No. 3-89-084-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

The main issue in this appeal is whether a payee on a “wraparound note” must continue to pay his own creditor — the holder of a senior lien — after the wraparound maker has defaulted on the wraparound note. Katherine Minton and Marke Hampe (collectively referred to as “Minton”), appel-lees, sued Gary Hampton, appellant, to recover the deficiency remaining on a wraparound note after foreclosure of a senior lien. Following a trial to the court, the district court rendered judgment in favor of Minton for the balance due on the wraparound note, less a credit for the amount bid at…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hanks v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Flag-Redfern Oil Co. v. Humble Exploration Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Coulson v. Lake L.B.J. Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hill v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fluorine On Call Ltd v. Fluorogas LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Bernal v. Garrison, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  3. Conner v. Lavaca Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Nikole, Inc. v. KlingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Med. Imaging Solutions Grp., Inc. of Tex. v. Westlake Surgical, LPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API