San Francisco Clearing-House v. MacDonald
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is an action upon a promissory note wherein the plaintiff, as the assignee of the payee for the purpose of collection only, recovered a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,546, from which an appeal has been taken upon the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.
Plaintiff’s ease rested upon proof of the execution of the note, the amount due and unpaid thereon, and its assignment to plaintiff for the purpose of collection.
A reversal of the judgment is asked for because of an alleged error in the admission of evidence, and on the ground that the findings of the trial court are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alberti v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lissak v. Crocker Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Allen ex rel. Stephens v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- More v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ripperdan v. WeldyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Sullivan v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Fetterley v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Burgess v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- London v. McConkeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.